In the Appalachian city of Steubenville, Ohio, a rusted steel suspension bridge stands as both a symbol of decay and a test of political cooperation. The Market Street Bridge, which stretches nearly 1,800 feet across the Ohio River toward the hills of Weirton, West Virginia, has been closed to traffic for close to three years. Transportation officials who have inspected the structure consider it beyond repair.
Michael Paprocki, a regional transportation planner, recently walked the span and pointed out gaping holes in the corroded beams beneath the bridge deck. He warned that if the structure remained standing long enough, it could eventually give way under its own weight. The visible deterioration leaves little doubt about why engineers shut it down.
Yet local leaders on both banks of the river argue that replacing the bridge is about more than restoring a crossing. They see it as an opportunity to reconnect two communities whose daily lives were intertwined before the closure, and to advance a much larger vision for outdoor recreation and economic development in a region that has struggled since the decline of heavy industry.
That larger vision is the Great American Rail-Trail, an ambitious effort to convert abandoned rail corridors into a continuous bike and pedestrian route stretching from the East Coast to the West. The Ohio River represents one of the most formidable natural obstacles along the proposed path, and a functioning bridge at Steubenville would help fill a critical gap in the route.
The project faces an unusual political landscape. The administration of President Donald Trump has been openly skeptical of federal spending on bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has publicly dismissed such investments, referring to them derisively as "DEI bike lanes" and making clear he does not want federal dollars directed toward them. His department has even moved to scrub references to bike lanes from its websites.
Despite that hostility in Washington, the Market Street Bridge replacement and the trail connection it would enable have attracted support from mayors and local officials on both sides of the river and both sides of the partisan divide. These leaders say the trail is not an ideological luxury but an economic necessity for a region seeking to reinvent itself.
The bipartisan backing reflects a practical calculation. Communities in Appalachia have watched manufacturing and coal jobs disappear over decades, and they are searching for new sources of visitors, spending, and quality of life. A multiuse trail that draws cyclists, walkers, and tourists could bring steady traffic through small downtowns that need it.
Supporters also note that trails of this kind tend to generate economic activity in places that are not typically on the radar of major investors. Cyclists on long-distance routes need food, lodging, repairs, and supplies, and they often linger in communities that welcome them. For towns like Steubenville and Weirton, that spending can be meaningful.
The bridge itself would likely be designed to accommodate both trail users and, potentially, other modes of travel, depending on the final engineering and funding decisions. Local planners emphasize that restoring a crossing is essential regardless of the trail, because residents on either side depend on access to jobs, schools, and services.
Still, the path forward is complicated by the funding environment in Washington. With the administration signaling opposition to pedestrian and bicycle projects, trail advocates may need to rely on a mix of state, local, and private money, or on federal programs that are not explicitly labeled as bike or pedestrian initiatives.
That reality has pushed proponents to frame the bridge and trail in terms of safety, connectivity, and economic growth rather than recreation alone. By emphasizing the bridge's role as basic infrastructure, they hope to keep the project viable even as the political debate over "bike lanes" continues to rage nationally.
The Steubenville effort also illustrates a broader tension in American infrastructure policy. While Washington argues over what kinds of transportation deserve federal support, local officials are left to piece together funding for projects that their constituents overwhelmingly want. In many cases, the projects that move forward are the ones with the widest base of local support.
For now, the Market Street Bridge remains closed, a hulking reminder of what has been lost. But the conversations happening around it suggest that even in a polarized era, a shared desire for economic renewal can bring together leaders who disagree on much else.
Whether that cooperation will be enough to overcome the obstacles in Washington remains uncertain. What is clear is that the fate of this bridge will help determine whether a coast-to-coast trail becomes a reality, or whether the Ohio River remains an impassable barrier in more ways than one.
The outcome will be watched far beyond Appalachia, because the Great American Rail-Trail is one of the most ambitious recreational infrastructure projects ever attempted in the United States. If a community as divided and as economically challenged as this one can build consensus around it, supporters believe other places can too.
(0)